Health sector reform · Governance · Institutions
Why health reform needs a home: the case for dedicated reform units
Reform stalls when nobody owns it. How dedicated health sector reform units can coordinate change, and the traps that undermine them.
Avicenna Consulting International · · 2 min read

Health departments are busy delivering services. Reform, which means changing how those services are planned, funded and governed, is rarely anyone's day job. Without a home, reform agendas drift, get captured by day-to-day pressures, or depend on a single champion who eventually moves on.
That is the case for a dedicated reform unit: a small, empowered team charged with coordinating change.
What a reform unit does
- Translates policy into a programme of work, sequencing reforms and tracking progress
- Coordinates across departments, programmes and development partners so that efforts do not pull in different directions
- Provides analysis such as option papers, costings and evaluations for decision-makers
- Supports implementation by working alongside the units that will own each change
- Communicates with stakeholders so that reform is understood, not just announced
What makes one effective
A clear mandate and senior backing. The unit needs authority to convene, request information and report directly to leadership.
Skilled, stable staff. Analytical, project management and communication skills matter more than headcount. High turnover erodes institutional memory.
Funding that is not entirely external. Units that depend wholly on donor money often disappear when projects end. A path to the regular budget is part of the design.
A link to planning and budgeting. Reform ideas that do not reach the annual plan and budget rarely happen.
Humility about its role. The unit coordinates; line departments implement. A unit that tries to do everything becomes a bottleneck.
Common traps
- creating a parallel structure that competes with existing departments
- becoming a "think tank" with little connection to implementation
- measuring activity (meetings, reports) instead of change in how the system works
- failing to plan for transition into permanent institutions
Designing for the long term
The best reform units are designed to be absorbed: their functions eventually become routine parts of the department's work. That means building capacity in line teams alongside the unit and agreeing from the start how the arrangement will evolve.
Establishing and strengthening reform units is a recurring theme in our work with provincial governments. The common lesson is that structure helps, but ownership and continuity matter more.
